Canon EF 100-300 mm f/5.6 vs Voigtlander Telomar AF 100-300 mm f/5.6-6.7
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Travel Wildlife | Travel Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 100-300 mm | 100-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/5.6 | f/5.6-6.7 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | - |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.26x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 685 g | 500 g |
| Length | 166.8 mm | 137.5 mm |
| Diameter | 75 mm | 69 mm |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 55 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1987 | - |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 100-300 mm f/5.6 (100-300 mm, f/5.6) and Voigtlander Telomar AF 100-300 mm f/5.6-6.7 (100-300 mm, f/5.6-6.7).
Voigtlander Telomar AF 100-300 mm f/5.6-6.7 is the lightest at 500 g, Canon EF 100-300 mm f/5.6 weighs 685 g.
Voigtlander Telomar AF 100-300 mm f/5.6-6.7 can focus closest at 1.5 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon
Voigtlander