Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM vs Sigma C 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife Video | Wildlife Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 100-400 mm | 100-400 mm |
| Aperture | f/4.5-5.6 | f/5-6.3 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.98 m | 1.6 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1600 g | 1160 g |
| Length | 193 mm | 182.3 mm |
| Diameter | 94 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2014 | 2017 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM (100-400 mm, f/4.5-5.6) and Sigma C 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM (100-400 mm, f/5-6.3).
Sigma C 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM is the lightest at 1160 g, Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM weighs 1600 g.
Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/4.5-5.6, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 100-400 mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM can focus closest at 0.98 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon