Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM vs Voigtlander Macro Dynar AF 100 mm f/3.5
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait | Macro |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/3.5 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.9 m | 0.43 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 460 g | 208 g |
| Length | 73.5 mm | 70.5 mm |
| Diameter | 75 mm | 68 mm |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 49 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1991 | - |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM (100 mm, f/2) and Voigtlander Macro Dynar AF 100 mm f/3.5 (100 mm, f/3.5).
Voigtlander Macro Dynar AF 100 mm f/3.5 is the lightest at 208 g, Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM weighs 460 g.
Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Voigtlander Macro Dynar AF 100 mm f/3.5 can focus closest at 0.43 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon
Voigtlander