Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L III USM vs Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L II USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape | Landscape |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 16-35 mm | 16-35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.28 m | 0.28 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 790 g | 640 g |
| Length | 88.5 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Diameter | 127.5 mm | 111.6 mm |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 82 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2016 | 2007 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L III USM (16-35 mm, f/2.8) and Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L II USM (16-35 mm, f/2.8).
Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L II USM is the lightest at 640 g, Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L III USM weighs 790 g.
Canon EF 16-35 mm f/2.8L III USM can focus closest at 0.28 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon