Canon EF 17-35 mm f/2.8L USM vs Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape | Landscape |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 17-35 mm | 17-35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.35 m | 0.27 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.11x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 545 g | 560 g |
| Length | 95.7 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Diameter | 83.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1996 | 2003 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 17-35 mm f/2.8L USM (17-35 mm, f/2.8) and Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical (17-35 mm, f/2.8).
Canon EF 17-35 mm f/2.8L USM is the lightest at 545 g, Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical weighs 560 g.
Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical can focus closest at 0.27 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon