Canon EF 24-70 mm f/4L IS USM vs Sigma A 24-70 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest Image Stabilization | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape Video | Landscape Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 24-70 mm | 24-70 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.38 m | 0.37 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 600 g | 1070 g |
| Length | 93 mm | 107.6 mm |
| Diameter | 83 mm | 88 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 82 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2012 | 2017 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 24-70 mm f/4L IS USM (24-70 mm, f/4) and Sigma A 24-70 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM (24-70 mm, f/2.8).
Canon EF 24-70 mm f/4L IS USM is the lightest at 600 g, Sigma A 24-70 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM weighs 1070 g.
Sigma A 24-70 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Sigma A 24-70 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM can focus closest at 0.37 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon