Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 USM vs Sigma 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape Travel | Landscape Travel Macro |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 28-200 mm | 28-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Aperture Blades | 6 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.45 m | 0.48 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 400 g |
| Length | 89.6 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Diameter | 78.4 mm | 70 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 62 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2000 | 2005 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (28-200 mm, f/3.5-5.6) and Sigma 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro (28-200 mm, f/3.5-5.6).
Sigma 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro is the lightest at 400 g, Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 USM weighs 500 g.
Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 USM can focus closest at 0.45 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon