Canon EF 28-300 mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM vs Sigma 28-300 mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape Wildlife Video | Landscape Travel Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 28-300 mm | 28-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.7 m | 0.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1670 g | 490 g |
| Length | 184 mm | 86 mm |
| Diameter | 92 mm | 74 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 62 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2004 | 2005 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 28-300 mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM (28-300 mm, f/3.5-5.6) and Sigma 28-300 mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro (28-300 mm, f/3.5-6.3).
Sigma 28-300 mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro is the lightest at 490 g, Canon EF 28-300 mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM weighs 1670 g.
Sigma 28-300 mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro can focus closest at 0.5 m minimum focus distance.
Canon EF 28-300 mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon