Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8 L IS II USM vs Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife | Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 2 m | 1.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | 0.24x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 2400 g | 1190 g |
| Length | 248 mm | 221 mm |
| Diameter | 128 mm | 90 mm |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2010 | 1997 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8 L IS II USM (300 mm, f/2.8) and Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM (300 mm, f/4).
Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM is the lightest at 1190 g, Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8 L IS II USM weighs 2400 g.
Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8 L IS II USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 300 mm f/4L IS USM can focus closest at 1.5 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting. Both lenses are weather-sealed.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon