Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8L USM vs Sigma 300 mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM APO
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife | Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 3 m | 2.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 2855 g | 2400 g |
| Length | 253 mm | 214 mm |
| Diameter | 125 mm | 119 mm |
| Filter Thread | 48 mm | 46 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1987 | 2005 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8L USM (300 mm, f/2.8) and Sigma 300 mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM APO (300 mm, f/2.8).
Sigma 300 mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM APO is the lightest at 2400 g, Canon EF 300 mm f/2.8L USM weighs 2855 g.
Sigma 300 mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM APO can focus closest at 2.5 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon