Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM vs Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.3 m | 0.3 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 580 g | 1174 g |
| Length | 103 mm | 124.8 mm |
| Diameter | 79 mm | 84.9 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1998 | 2017 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM (35 mm, f/1.4) and Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4 (35 mm, f/1.4).
Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM is the lightest at 580 g, Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4 weighs 1174 g.
Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM can focus closest at 0.3 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon
Carl Zeiss