Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 vs Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | Fastest Aperture |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape Street |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.4 |
| Aperture Blades | 5 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.25 m | 0.3 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 580 g |
| Length | 42.5 mm | 103 mm |
| Diameter | 67.4 mm | 79 mm |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1990 | 1998 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 (35 mm, f/2) and Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM (35 mm, f/1.4).
Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 is the lightest at 210 g, Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM weighs 580 g.
Canon EF 35 mm f/1.4L USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 can focus closest at 0.25 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon