Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 vs Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 5 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.25 m | 0.3 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 702 g |
| Length | 42.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Diameter | 67.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 58 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1990 | 2015 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 (35 mm, f/2) and Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 (35 mm, f/2).
Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 is the lightest at 210 g, Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/2 weighs 702 g.
Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 can focus closest at 0.25 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon
Carl Zeiss