Canon EF 35 mm f/2 IS USM vs Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest Image Stabilization | Fastest Aperture |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Budget | Portrait Landscape |
Price & Availability | ||
| Shop | ||
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.4 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.24 m | 0.3 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | 0.19x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 335 g | 665 g |
| Length | 63 mm | 77 mm |
| Diameter | 78 mm | 94 mm |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 35 mm f/2 IS USM (35 mm, f/2) and Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM (35 mm, f/1.4).
Canon EF 35 mm f/2 IS USM is the lightest at 335 g, Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM weighs 665 g.
Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 35 mm f/2 IS USM can focus closest at 0.24 m minimum focus distance.
Canon EF 35 mm f/2 IS USM includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Sony E lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Sony FE lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Canon
