Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Canon EF 400 mm f/4 DO IS II USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife | Budget Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 2.5 m | 3.3 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 2840 g | 2100 g |
| Length | 163 mm | 128 mm |
| Diameter | 343 mm | 232.7 mm |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 52 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2018 | 2014 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L IS III USM (400 mm, f/2.8) and Canon EF 400 mm f/4 DO IS II USM (400 mm, f/4).
Canon EF 400 mm f/4 DO IS II USM is the lightest at 2100 g, Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L IS III USM weighs 2840 g.
Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L IS III USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L IS III USM can focus closest at 2.5 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon