Canon EF 400 mm f/5.6L USM vs Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L II USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | Fastest Aperture |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife | Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Aperture | f/5.6 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 3.5 m | 4 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.12x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1250 g | 5910 g |
| Length | 256.5 mm | 348 mm |
| Diameter | 90 mm | 167 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 48 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1993 | 1996 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 400 mm f/5.6L USM (400 mm, f/5.6) and Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L II USM (400 mm, f/2).
Canon EF 400 mm f/5.6L USM is the lightest at 1250 g, Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L II USM weighs 5910 g.
Canon EF 400 mm f/2.8L II USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 400 mm f/5.6L USM can focus closest at 3.5 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses are weather-sealed.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon