Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest Image Stabilization | Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Video | Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 70-200 mm | 70-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 11 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.2 m | 1.2 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1440 g | 1805 g |
| Length | 89 mm | 94.2 mm |
| Diameter | 199 mm | 202.9 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 82 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2018 | 2010 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS III USM (70-200 mm, f/2.8) and Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM (70-200 mm, f/2.8).
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS III USM is the lightest at 1440 g, Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM weighs 1805 g.
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS III USM can focus closest at 1.2 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon