Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM vs Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest Image Stabilization | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Travel Video | Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 70-200 mm | 70-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1 m | 1.4 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 780 g | 1590 g |
| Length | 80 mm | 197 mm |
| Diameter | 176 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2018 | 2001 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM (70-200 mm, f/4) and Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS USM (70-200 mm, f/2.8).
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM is the lightest at 780 g, Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS USM weighs 1590 g.
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L IS USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM can focus closest at 1 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon