Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM vs Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG OS
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Travel Wildlife Video | Travel Wildlife Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 70-300 mm | 70-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.2 m | 1.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 710 g | 610 g |
| Length | 145.5 mm | 126.5 mm |
| Diameter | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 62 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2016 | 2009 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM (70-300 mm, f/4) and Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG OS (70-300 mm, f/4).
Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG OS is the lightest at 610 g, Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM weighs 710 g.
Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM can focus closest at 1.2 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon