Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM vs Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Travel Wildlife Video | Travel Wildlife Macro |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 70-300 mm | 70-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.5 m | 0.95 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 630 g | 540 g |
| Length | 76.5 mm | 122 mm |
| Diameter | 142.8 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 58 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2005 | 2005 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (70-300 mm, f/4) and Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro (70-300 mm, f/4).
Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro is the lightest at 540 g, Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM weighs 630 g.
Sigma 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro can focus closest at 0.95 m minimum focus distance.
Canon EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon