Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM vs Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 III USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Travel Wildlife Video | Travel Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 75-300 mm | 75-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.5 m | 1.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.26x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 650 g | 480 g |
| Length | 138.2 mm | 122 mm |
| Diameter | 78.5 mm | 71 mm |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 58 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 1995 | 1999 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (75-300 mm, f/4) and Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 III USM (75-300 mm, f/4).
Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 III USM is the lightest at 480 g, Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM weighs 650 g.
Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM can focus closest at 1.5 m minimum focus distance.
Canon EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 IS USM includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon