Canon EF-S 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS vs Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape Travel Video | Landscape Travel Macro |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 18-200 mm | 18-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Aperture Blades | 6 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.45 m | 0.39 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | 0.33x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 600 g | 430 g |
| Length | 79 mm | 86 mm |
| Diameter | 102 mm | 70.7 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2008 | 2014 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon EF-S 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS (18-200 mm, f/3.5-5.6) and Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM (18-200 mm, f/3.5-6.3).
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM is the lightest at 430 g, Canon EF-S 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS weighs 600 g.
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM can focus closest at 0.39 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon