Canon TS-E 135 mm f/4L MACRO vs Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | Fastest Aperture |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Macro | Portrait |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 135 mm | 135 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | Yes |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.48 m | 0.8 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | 0.25x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1110 g | 1123 g |
| Length | 139.1 mm | 115 mm |
| Diameter | 88.5 mm | 89.7 mm |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2017 | 2016 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Canon TS-E 135 mm f/4L MACRO (135 mm, f/4) and Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 (135 mm, f/2).
Canon TS-E 135 mm f/4L MACRO is the lightest at 1110 g, Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 weighs 1123 g.
Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon TS-E 135 mm f/4L MACRO can focus closest at 0.48 m minimum focus distance.
Carl Zeiss Milvus 135 mm f/2 is weather-sealed for challenging conditions.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon
Carl Zeiss