Carl Zeiss Batis 40 mm f/2 CF vs Sigma A 40 mm f/1.4 DG HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | Fastest Aperture |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Street | Portrait Budget |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/1.4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.24 m | 0.4 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 361 g | 1200 g |
| Length | 91 mm | 87.8 mm |
| Diameter | 93 mm | 131 mm |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 82 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2018 | 2018 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Carl Zeiss Batis 40 mm f/2 CF (40 mm, f/2) and Sigma A 40 mm f/1.4 DG HSM (40 mm, f/1.4).
Carl Zeiss Batis 40 mm f/2 CF is the lightest at 361 g, Sigma A 40 mm f/1.4 DG HSM weighs 1200 g.
Sigma A 40 mm f/1.4 DG HSM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Carl Zeiss Batis 40 mm f/2 CF can focus closest at 0.24 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Carl Zeiss