Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 35 mm f/2 ZM vs Voigtlander Ultron 35 mm f/2 Aspherical VM Vintage Line
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape Street |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 10 | 10 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.7 m | 0.58 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 170 g |
| Length | 56 mm | 52 mm |
| Diameter | 52 mm | 28.1 mm |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 39 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | - | 2019 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 35 mm f/2 ZM (35 mm, f/2) and Voigtlander Ultron 35 mm f/2 Aspherical VM Vintage Line (35 mm, f/2).
Voigtlander Ultron 35 mm f/2 Aspherical VM Vintage Line is the lightest at 170 g, Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 35 mm f/2 ZM weighs 240 g.
Voigtlander Ultron 35 mm f/2 Aspherical VM Vintage Line can focus closest at 0.58 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Carl Zeiss
Voigtlander