Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 35 mm f/2.8 ZM vs Leica Summicron-M 35 mm Asph
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape Street |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 10 | 11 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.7 m | 0.7 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 255 g |
| Length | 55 mm | 35.7 mm |
| Diameter | 52 mm | 53 mm |
| Filter Thread | 43 mm | 39 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2019 | - |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 35 mm f/2.8 ZM (35 mm, f/2.8) and Leica Summicron-M 35 mm Asph (35 mm, f/2).
Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 35 mm f/2.8 ZM is the lightest at 200 g, Leica Summicron-M 35 mm Asph weighs 255 g.
Leica Summicron-M 35 mm Asph offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Carl Zeiss C Biogon T* 35 mm f/2.8 ZM can focus closest at 0.7 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Carl Zeiss
Leica