Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 35 mm f/2 Aspherical
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape Budget |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.4-16 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 10 | 12 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.7 m | 0.35 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 381 g | 352 g |
| Length | 65.2 mm | 62.6 mm |
| Diameter | 63.2 mm | 67.3 mm |
| Filter Thread | 49 mm | 49 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2014 | 2021 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM (35 mm, f/1.4-16) and Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 35 mm f/2 Aspherical (35 mm, f/2).
Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 35 mm f/2 Aspherical is the lightest at 352 g, Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM weighs 381 g.
Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4-16, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 35 mm f/2 Aspherical can focus closest at 0.35 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Carl Zeiss
Voigtlander