Carl Zeiss Milvus 100 mm f/2M vs Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait | Portrait |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.44 m | 0.9 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 843 g | 460 g |
| Length | 104 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Diameter | 80.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 58 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2015 | 1991 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Carl Zeiss Milvus 100 mm f/2M (100 mm, f/2) and Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM (100 mm, f/2).
Canon EF 100 mm f/2.0 USM is the lightest at 460 g, Carl Zeiss Milvus 100 mm f/2M weighs 843 g.
Carl Zeiss Milvus 100 mm f/2M can focus closest at 0.44 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type