Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4 vs Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | Lightest |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait Landscape | Portrait Landscape Street |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.4 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 5 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.3 m | 0.25 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1174 g | 210 g |
| Length | 124.8 mm | 42.5 mm |
| Diameter | 84.9 mm | 67.4 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 52 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2017 | 1990 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4 (35 mm, f/1.4) and Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 (35 mm, f/2).
Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 is the lightest at 210 g, Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4 weighs 1174 g.
Carl Zeiss Milvus 35 mm f/1.4 offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 35 mm f/2.0 can focus closest at 0.25 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Carl Zeiss
Canon