Kenko Tokina 400 mm f/8 N II vs Nikon Nikkor MF 400 mm f/3.5 IF-ED
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | Fastest Aperture |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife | Wildlife |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Aperture | f/8 | f/3.5 |
| Aperture Blades | - | - |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.15 m | 4.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 2800 g |
| Length | 82 mm | 134 mm |
| Diameter | 74 mm | 304 mm |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 122 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2021 | 1977 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Kenko Tokina 400 mm f/8 N II (400 mm, f/8) and Nikon Nikkor MF 400 mm f/3.5 IF-ED (400 mm, f/3.5).
Kenko Tokina 400 mm f/8 N II is the lightest at 500 g, Nikon Nikkor MF 400 mm f/3.5 IF-ED weighs 2800 g.
Nikon Nikkor MF 400 mm f/3.5 IF-ED offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/3.5, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Kenko Tokina 400 mm f/8 N II can focus closest at 1.15 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.