Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 mm f/2.0 Asph vs Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape Budget |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2-16 | f/1.4-16 |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 10 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.3 m | 0.7 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.16x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 381 g |
| Length | 40.9 mm | 65.2 mm |
| Diameter | 53 mm | 63.2 mm |
| Filter Thread | 39 mm | 49 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2021 | 2014 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 mm f/2.0 Asph (35 mm, f/2-16) and Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM (35 mm, f/1.4-16).
Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 mm f/2.0 Asph is the lightest at 320 g, Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM weighs 381 g.
Carl Zeiss Distagon T 35 mm f/1.4 ZM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4-16, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 mm f/2.0 Asph can focus closest at 0.3 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Leica-M lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Leica-M lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Leica-M lenses optimized for Astrophotography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Leica
Carl Zeiss