Leica Summilux-M 35 mm Asph vs Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 35 mm f/2 ZM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | Lightest |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Street | Portrait Landscape Street |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.4-16 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 10 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.7 m | 0.7 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 320 g | 240 g |
| Length | 46 mm | 56 mm |
| Diameter | 56 mm | 52 mm |
| Filter Thread | 46 mm | 43 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | - | - |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Leica Summilux-M 35 mm Asph (35 mm, f/1.4-16) and Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 35 mm f/2 ZM (35 mm, f/2).
Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 35 mm f/2 ZM is the lightest at 240 g, Leica Summilux-M 35 mm Asph weighs 320 g.
Leica Summilux-M 35 mm Asph offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.4-16, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Leica Summilux-M 35 mm Asph can focus closest at 0.7 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Leica-M lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Leica-M lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Leica-M lenses optimized for Astrophotography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Leica
Carl Zeiss