Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200 mm f/2G IF-ED VR vs Nikon Nikkor MF 200 mm f/4 IF Macro
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Wildlife | Wildlife Macro |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 200 mm | 200 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.9 m | 0.71 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 2900 g | 880 g |
| Length | 203 mm | 193 mm |
| Diameter | 124 mm | 66 mm |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 62 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2004 | - |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200 mm f/2G IF-ED VR (200 mm, f/2) and Nikon Nikkor MF 200 mm f/4 IF Macro (200 mm, f/4).
Nikon Nikkor MF 200 mm f/4 IF Macro is the lightest at 880 g, Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200 mm f/2G IF-ED VR weighs 2900 g.
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200 mm f/2G IF-ED VR offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Nikon Nikkor MF 200 mm f/4 IF Macro can focus closest at 0.71 m minimum focus distance.
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200 mm f/2G IF-ED VR includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Nikon Nikkor