SainSonic KamLan 32 mm f/1.1 vs Canon EF-M 32 mm f/1.4 STM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | Lightest |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape | Landscape Street |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.1 | f/1.4 |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.4 m | 0.23 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.1x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 601 g | 235 g |
| Length | 92 mm | 60.9 mm |
| Diameter | 70 mm | 56.5 mm |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 43 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2021 | 2018 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing SainSonic KamLan 32 mm f/1.1 (32 mm, f/1.1) and Canon EF-M 32 mm f/1.4 STM (32 mm, f/1.4).
Canon EF-M 32 mm f/1.4 STM is the lightest at 235 g, SainSonic KamLan 32 mm f/1.1 weighs 601 g.
SainSonic KamLan 32 mm f/1.1 offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.1, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF-M 32 mm f/1.4 STM can focus closest at 0.23 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Canon