135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR vs 135 mm f/2.0 ED UMC
Samyang
135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR
Samyang
135 mm f/2.0 ED UMC
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait | Portrait |
Price & Availability | ||
| Shop | ||
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 135 mm | 135 mm |
| Aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.8 m | 0.8 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.27x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 830 g | 830 g |
| Length | 122 mm | 82 mm |
| Diameter | 82 mm | 122 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2015 | 2015 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR (135 mm, f/2) and Samyang 135 mm f/2.0 ED UMC (135 mm, f/2).
Both lenses weigh approximately the same at around 830 g.
Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR can focus closest at 0.8 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Micro Four Thirds lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Sony E lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Sony FE lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Here we are comparing the Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR and the Samyang 135 mm f/2.0 ED UMC. The Samyang 135 mm T2.2 ED UMC VDSLR is a 135mm telephoto prime lens with a maximum aperture of f/2, released in 2015. The Samyang 135 mm f/2.0 ED UMC is a 135mm telephoto prime lens with a maximum aperture of f/2, released in 2015.
Both lenses were released in the same year (2015), making this a fair comparison in terms of age and technology.
Below you will find a detailed side-by-side comparison of their specifications, features, and key differences.
