Sigma 120-300 mm f/2.8 DG EX APO IF HSM vs Nikon Nikkor AF-S 120-300 mm f/2.8E FL ED SR VR
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Wildlife | Wildlife Video |
Price & Availability | ||
| Shop | ||
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 120-300 mm | 120-300 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.5 m | - |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 2600 g | 3250 g |
| Length | 271 mm | 303.5 mm |
| Diameter | 112.8 mm | 128 mm |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 112 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2011 | 2020 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 120-300 mm f/2.8 DG EX APO IF HSM (120-300 mm, f/2.8) and Nikon Nikkor AF-S 120-300 mm f/2.8E FL ED SR VR (120-300 mm, f/2.8).
Sigma 120-300 mm f/2.8 DG EX APO IF HSM is the lightest at 2600 g, Nikon Nikkor AF-S 120-300 mm f/2.8E FL ED SR VR weighs 3250 g.
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 120-300 mm f/2.8E FL ED SR VR includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Wildlife Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Wildlife Photography
Top-rated Sigma lenses optimized for Wildlife Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Nikon Nikkor
