Sigma 14 mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical HSM vs Canon EF 14 mm f/2.8L USM II
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape | Landscape |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 14 mm | 14 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 6 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.18 m | 0.2 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 630 g | 645 g |
| Length | 90.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Diameter | 82 mm | 94 mm |
| Filter Thread | - | - |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2008 | 2007 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 14 mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical HSM (14 mm, f/2.8) and Canon EF 14 mm f/2.8L USM II (14 mm, f/2.8).
Sigma 14 mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical HSM is the lightest at 630 g, Canon EF 14 mm f/2.8L USM II weighs 645 g.
Sigma 14 mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical HSM can focus closest at 0.18 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Canon