Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical vs Nikon Nikkor AF-S 17-35 mm f/2.8D ED-IF
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape | Landscape |
Price & Availability | ||
| Shop | ||
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 17-35 mm | 17-35 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.27 m | 0.28 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 560 g | 745 g |
| Length | 86.2 mm | 106 mm |
| Diameter | 83.5 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2003 | 1999 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical (17-35 mm, f/2.8) and Nikon Nikkor AF-S 17-35 mm f/2.8D ED-IF (17-35 mm, f/2.8).
Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical is the lightest at 560 g, Nikon Nikkor AF-S 17-35 mm f/2.8D ED-IF weighs 745 g.
Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical can focus closest at 0.27 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Sony A lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Nikon Nikkor
