Sigma 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM vs Sigma C 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | APS-C | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape Travel Macro | Landscape Travel Macro |
Price & Availability | ||
| Shop | ||
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 17-70 mm | 17-70 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.22 m | 0.22 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 535 g | 470 g |
| Length | 79 mm | 79 mm |
| Diameter | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM (17-70 mm, f/2.8) and Sigma C 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM (17-70 mm, f/2.8).
Sigma C 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM is the lightest at 470 g, Sigma 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM weighs 535 g.
Sigma 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.0 DC Macro OS HSM can focus closest at 0.22 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Sony A lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
