Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM vs Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape Travel Video | Landscape Travel Macro |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 18-200 mm | 18-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.45 m | 0.39 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | 0.33x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 490 g | 430 g |
| Length | 87.7 mm | 86 mm |
| Diameter | 75.3 mm | 70.7 mm |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2011 | 2014 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM (18-200 mm, f/3.5) and Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM (18-200 mm, f/3.5).
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM is the lightest at 430 g, Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM weighs 490 g.
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM can focus closest at 0.39 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Canon EF-S lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
