Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM vs Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest Image Stabilization | Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape Travel Macro | Landscape Travel Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 18-250 mm | 18-250 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.35 m | 0.45 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 470 g | 630 g |
| Length | 88.6 mm | 101 mm |
| Diameter | 73.5 mm | 79 mm |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM (18-250 mm, f/3.5-6.3) and Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM (18-250 mm, f/3.5-6.3).
Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM is the lightest at 470 g, Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM weighs 630 g.
Sigma 18-250 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM can focus closest at 0.35 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
