Sigma 24-70 mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF vs Canon EF 24-70 mm f/2.8L II USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape | Landscape |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 24-70 mm | 24-70 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.4 m | 0.38 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 290 g | 805 g |
| Length | 78.9 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Diameter | 69.5 mm | 113 mm |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 82 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2001 | 2012 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 24-70 mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF (24-70 mm, f/3.5) and Canon EF 24-70 mm f/2.8L II USM (24-70 mm, f/2.8).
Sigma 24-70 mm f/3.5-5.6 Aspherical HF is the lightest at 290 g, Canon EF 24-70 mm f/2.8L II USM weighs 805 g.
Canon EF 24-70 mm f/2.8L II USM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/2.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Canon EF 24-70 mm f/2.8L II USM can focus closest at 0.38 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Canon