Sigma 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro vs Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape Travel Budget | Landscape Travel |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 28-200 mm | 28-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Aperture Blades | 8 | 6 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.48 m | 0.45 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 400 g | 495 g |
| Length | 77.7 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Diameter | 70 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2005 | 2000 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro (28-200 mm, f/3.5) and Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 (28-200 mm, f/3.5).
Sigma 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 DG Macro is the lightest at 400 g, Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 weighs 495 g.
Canon EF 28-200 mm f/3.5-5.6 can focus closest at 0.45 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Canon
