Sigma A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM vs Carl Zeiss Apo Sonnar T* 135 mm f/2.0 ZE/ZF.2
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait | Portrait |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 135 mm | 135 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.8 m | 0.8 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1130 g | 930 g |
| Length | 114.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Diameter | 91.4 mm | 130 mm |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2017 | 2012 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM (135 mm, f/1.8) and Carl Zeiss Apo Sonnar T* 135 mm f/2.0 ZE/ZF.2 (135 mm, f/2).
Carl Zeiss Apo Sonnar T* 135 mm f/2.0 ZE/ZF.2 is the lightest at 930 g, Sigma A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM weighs 1130 g.
Sigma A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM offers the fastest maximum aperture at f/1.8, allowing for better low-light performance and shallower depth of field.
Sigma A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM can focus closest at 0.8 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Sony E lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Sony FE lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Leica-L lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Carl Zeiss