Sigma A 24-105 mm f/4 DG OS HSM vs Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS II USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Landscape Travel Video | Landscape Travel Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 24-105 mm | 24-105 mm |
| Aperture | f/4 | f/4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 10 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.45 m | 0.45 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 885 g | 795 g |
| Length | 88.6 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Diameter | 109.4 mm | 118 mm |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2013 | 2016 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma A 24-105 mm f/4 DG OS HSM (24-105 mm, f/4) and Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS II USM (24-105 mm, f/4).
Canon EF 24-105 mm f/4L IS II USM is the lightest at 795 g, Sigma A 24-105 mm f/4 DG OS HSM weighs 885 g.
Sigma A 24-105 mm f/4 DG OS HSM can focus closest at 0.45 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Canon