Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM vs Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 35 mm f/1.4 ZE/ZF.2
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest | |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Portrait Landscape Budget | Portrait Landscape |
Price & Availability | ||
| Shop | ||
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 |
| Aperture Blades | 9 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | No | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.3 m | 0.3 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.19x | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 665 g | 830 g |
| Length | 77 mm | 120 mm |
| Diameter | 94 mm | 75 mm |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM (35 mm, f/1.4) and Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 35 mm f/1.4 ZE/ZF.2 (35 mm, f/1.4).
Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM is the lightest at 665 g, Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 35 mm f/1.4 ZE/ZF.2 weighs 830 g.
Sigma A 35 mm f/1.4 DG HSM can focus closest at 0.3 m minimum focus distance.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Sony E lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Sony FE lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Leica-L lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Carl Zeiss
