Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM vs Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Lightest Image Stabilization | Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | APS-C |
| Best For | Landscape Travel Macro | Landscape Travel Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 18-200 mm | 18-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.39 m | 0.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.33x | 0.22x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 430 g | 560 g |
| Length | 86 mm | 96.5 mm |
| Diameter | 70.7 mm | 77 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2014 | 2005 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM (18-200 mm, f/3.5) and Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR (18-200 mm, f/3.5).
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM is the lightest at 430 g, Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200 mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED VR weighs 560 g.
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM can focus closest at 0.39 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Nikon F lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Pentax K lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Canon EF-S lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type