Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM vs Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Fastest Aperture Image Stabilization | Lightest |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Best For | Landscape Travel Macro | Landscape Travel |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 18-200 mm | 18-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/null-6.3 |
| Aperture Blades | 7 | 7 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 0.39 m | 0.4 m |
| Max. Magnification | 0.33x | 0.23x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 430 g | 405 g |
| Length | 86 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Diameter | 70.7 mm | 70 mm |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2014 | - |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM (18-200 mm, f/3.5-6.3) and Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC (18-200 mm, f/null-6.3).
Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC is the lightest at 405 g, Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM weighs 430 g.
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM can focus closest at 0.39 m minimum focus distance.
Sigma C 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM includes image stabilization.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
