Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM vs Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L USM
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Video | - |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 70-200 mm | 70-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 8 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | No |
| Weather Sealed | No | Yes |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.2 m | 1.5 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | - |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1805 g | 1310 g |
| Length | 94.2 mm | 193.6 mm |
| Diameter | 202.9 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2010 | 1995 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM (70-200 mm, f/2.8) and Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L USM (70-200 mm, f/2.8).
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L USM is the lightest at 1310 g, Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM weighs 1805 g.
Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM can focus closest at 1.2 m minimum focus distance.
Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM includes image stabilization. Canon EF 70-200 mm f/2.8L USM is weather-sealed for challenging conditions.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Astrophotography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Canon