Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM vs Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200 mm f/2.8E FL ED VR
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
| Compare | Image Stabilization | Lightest Image Stabilization |
|---|---|---|
| Mount | ||
| Sensor Size | Full Frame | Full Frame |
| Best For | Video | Video |
Optical Specifications | ||
| Focal Length | 70-200 mm | 70-200 mm |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Aperture Blades | 11 | 9 |
Features | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
| Weather Sealed | No | No |
Close-up Performance | ||
| Min. Focus Distance | 1.2 m | 1.1 m |
| Max. Magnification | - | 0.21x |
Physical Specifications | ||
| Weight | 1805 g | 1430 g |
| Length | 94.2 mm | 202.5 mm |
| Diameter | 202.9 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Price & Availability | ||
| Release Year | 2010 | 2016 |
| Shop | ||
Shopping links may contain affiliate codes that support this site at no extra cost to you.
Comparing Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM (70-200 mm, f/2.8) and Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200 mm f/2.8E FL ED VR (70-200 mm, f/2.8).
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200 mm f/2.8E FL ED VR is the lightest at 1430 g, Sigma S 70-200 mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM weighs 1805 g.
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200 mm f/2.8E FL ED VR can focus closest at 1.1 m minimum focus distance.
Both lenses feature image stabilization for handheld shooting.
Use the detailed comparison table below to see all specifications side-by-side and find the perfect lens for your photography needs.
Discover the best lenses for your camera mount and photography style
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Portrait Photography
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Landscape Photography
Top-rated Canon EF lenses optimized for Astrophotography
Explore all curated lens recommendations by mount and photography type
Nikon Nikkor